Posted 1 hour ago
fishingboatproceeds:

shreksforthememories:

and then they didnt put her on the final list

Disappointing.

fishingboatproceeds:

shreksforthememories:

and then they didnt put her on the final list

Disappointing.

Posted 1 hour ago

reagan-was-a-horrible-president:

universalequalityisinevitable:

An undeniably large part of what keeps poverty going is the fact that there are people who think that if they vote with the rich they’ll somehow magically become the rich. The trouble is, rich people don’t vote. They own.

"Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." 

(Quote attributed to John Steinbeck but is under dispute. Regardless, it’s still true.)

Posted 1 hour ago

roachpatrol:

cvmfest:

ricotomate:

A bunch of drunk college kids tried to play “Alice in Wonderland”

I cry of laughter everytime I watch this. 

what the fuclk did i just watch

the best goddamn adaptation ever

Posted 1 hour ago

doemilk:

Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story. Lolita is not a love story.

Posted 1 hour ago

(Source: blazzziken)

Posted 1 hour ago

dggeoff:

ibeggedformercytwice:

ibeggedformercytwice:

My medieval servant boy has gone missing. I’ll just use Google to see if I can find him.

image

Oh bother.

im deleting this fucking website

Posted 1 hour ago

danofthetubes:

anemia:

damianoisfamous:

excadrill:

the look


So the internet just gave my tumblr name a whole new (literal) meaning. I was alerted to a photo of me gathering massive attention via a friend who linked me to a Reddit post titled “Don’t worry guys, I’m taking hipster to the next level.”

Apparently some guy on the train uploaded this photo to twitter it has been spreading like wildfire since. Surprisingly when I read the thread on Reddit a lot of it was positive/supportive. I’m surprised by how unfazed and genuinely funny I find the negative comments. People’s theories as to why I am dressed like this, and who I really am are also really interesting. 

I’m dressed like this for a number reasons. Firstly, and fore-mostly, I genuinely like the clothes I am wearing. I’ve described my look as “anywhere from hipster chic to kawaii gangsta Harajuku princess”. This is the epitome of the latter. I love sailor moon, I love pink, those converse are kawaii as fuck and yeah fuck you I’m wearing Prada sunglasses. I don’t really dress like this all the time, but I wish I did more often. I mostly don’t because I want to keep the look fresh. I wore this outfit because I had an art exhibition at my college and wanted to express myself.

I also find men’s fashion extremely limiting in both types of clothes, cuts of clothes and colours. Women have so many beautiful options. So I pillage their aisles a lot because I wanna look pretty.

This was also a statement. As an artist I think fashion is incredibly important. This day, I wanted something that not only reflected my personality and artistic sensibilities but also have some social commentary. A lot of my work, or what I want my work to speak about, is sex and sexuality and notions of gender and gender roles. How many of you knew pink actually use to be associated with boys, not girls? Personally I think the idea of “This is a boy colour”, “This is a girl colour” or “Barbies are for girls”, “Power Rangers are for boys” is dumb as fuck. Creating social and cultural boundaries does nothing but limit the potential of a person. By dressing like this I am breaking that boundary for myself and attempting to reflect that sentiment.  

an inspiration

Keeps getting better. Rock on, man.

(Source: exxxmilitary)

Posted 1 hour ago
Posted 1 hour ago

dirrtyflowerchild:

all-about-living-up:

adeventute time helped me get over my last breakup no fuckin joke i shit u not

literally adventure time knows their shit

(Source: pretendplaytime)

Posted 1 hour ago

hannahevolving:

Coming up with this snapchat is my crowning achievement in life.

Posted 2 hours ago

(Source: collegehumor)

Posted 2 hours ago

windowsvriska:

do you ever wonder if u have a reputation like people u dont even know could have opinions about u 

(Source: vampirequeenarchives)

Posted 3 hours ago

Joss Whedon's 'Avengers: Age Of Ultron' Villain Is An 'Endearing' Menace | MTV.com

geek-studio:

In “The Avengers,” Earth’s mightiest heroes had it easy. All they had to worry about was the single threat of Loki — and, admittedly, his invading alien army. But one well-deployed nuclear bomb shot from New York and carried through to the far side of the universe took care of that problem right quick.

But in the upcoming sequel, “The Avengers: Age of Ultron,” Captain America and friends will face deadlier threats — and yes, that’s “threats,” plural, as in more than one. At least four, in fact, as “Age of Ultron” features incoming HYDRA menace Baron von Strucker (played by Thomas Kretschmann) and his cohorts, “The Twins,” super-siblings Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen).

All three of those characters debuted in the “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” mid-credits sequence, and even though Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are best-known for their heroics, it sounds as if they’ll start the film on the wrong side of the law.

Then, of course, there’s the titular robot menace himself: Ultron, played by “The Blacklist” actor James Spader. The maniacal machine is one of the most hotly-awaited villains in the superhero movie scene, and writer-director Joss Whedon is having a field day with the character.

"I’m having a blast with Ultron," he told Empire in a new interview. "He’s not a creature of logic — he’s a robot who’s genuinely disturbed. We’re finding out what makes him menacing and at the same time endearing and funny and strange and unexpected, and everything a robot never is."

Four villains for the “Avengers” sequel, assuming there aren’t others in the works, and not even counting any other android allies Ultron might recruit along the way. Is that three villains too many? Is Whedon simply adding these characters to put a smile on fans’ faces? Absolutely not, according to the man himself.

"I fiercely dislike the idea of just throwing in more people for the sake of doing that," he stressed. "But last time I had all of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes versus one British character actor, and I needed more conflict."

Not that Tom Hiddleston isn’t enough to carry the weight against the Avengers, but it’s comforting to know that the sequel will be an appropriately super-sized affair.

"The Avengers: Age of Ultron" assembles in theaters on May 1, 2015.

Posted 4 hours ago

jthenr-comics-vault:

There was a gimmick the Uncanny X-Men editors were doing in the mid 80s. Having an X-Men teammate “answer” the letters readers would send in to
387 Park Avenue South, New York, NY. In this particular issue, it’s Rogue’s turn. So she answers questions bout the issue she joined the team, Uncanny X-Men #171.

Today she’s one of the most popular X-Men, but at the time Rogue was not well liked and her inclusion on the team was in question. Needless to say, this made for one of the more fascinating Letter’s Pages to read, especially when keeping all of Rogue’s history in perspective. 

You can read the letters page questions and Rogue’s answers here

Posted 4 hours ago